EmpCo Audit · EmpCo Knowledge
From 27 September 2026, generic, unsubstantiated environmental claims such as “climate-neutral”, “sustainable”, “eco-friendly”, “green”, “eco”, “biodegradable” and “climate-positive” are banned in advertising – “climate-neutral” additionally whenever the claim rests solely on carbon offsetting. This is how the EmpCo Directive (EU 2024/825) regulates it – EU-wide and with no transition period for existing content.
“Can I still advertise with ‘climate-neutral’?” – the question occupies marketing teams and agencies across the DACH region. This page lists which advertising terms are specifically affected, why “climate-neutral” is the sharpest special case, what remains permitted – and how to convert your existing copy in time.
“‘Clean’, ‘sustainable’ and ‘green’ are not regulated terms.” – top comment in r/BeautyGuruChatter. That was true for a long time. From 27 September 2026 it no longer is.— Discussion on Reddit, r/BeautyGuruChatter
From the cut-off date, making generic environmental claims whose recognised excellent environmental performance cannot be demonstrated is banned (new point 4a of the “blacklist”). The directive’s recitals name as examples of such terms, among others:
No term is as central to enforcement as “climate-neutral”. The German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has already ruled (judgment of 27 June 2024 – I ZR 98/23) that the ambiguous term may only be used in advertising if it is clearly explained in the advertising itself. And the most prominent case comes from Germany: Apple was banned at first instance from advertising the Apple Watch as “carbon neutral” (Frankfurt Regional Court, August 2025; not final) – on Reddit one of the most-discussed greenwashing threads of all.
The background is offsetting scepticism: carbon offsets are not a scam per se, but they are under heavy criticism because their actual climate impact is often hard to measure and sometimes overstated. This is exactly why EmpCo draws its clearest line here – from 2026, offsetting alone no longer suffices as the basis of a climate-neutrality claim. Which fines apply for violations is shown by the Shein and Apple cases.
EmpCo does not ban environmental communication – it bans the unsubstantiated generic claim. Whoever gets specific and secures the evidence beforehand may continue to advertise environmental properties. The overview:
| Without proof | With verifiable evidence | |
|---|---|---|
| “sustainable”, “eco-friendly”, “green”, “eco” | Banned | Permitted if concrete and substantiated |
| “Climate-neutral” based on offsetting | Banned | Remains banned – offsetting alone never suffices |
| “Climate-neutral” based on reductions | Banned without proof | Permitted with reduction evidence and explanation |
| Sustainability labels | Own labels banned | Certified or officially established: permitted |
| Future promises (“by 2030 …”) | Banned | Permitted with verifiable, public interim targets |
The term bans do not come out of nowhere: the EmpCo Directive has been in force since March 2024 and amends the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (2005/29/EC) and the Consumer Rights Directive (2011/83/EU). Its core is the burden-of-proof logic – whoever advertises environmental benefits to consumers must be able to prove them before the claim becomes public.
A common source of confusion: for the Green Claims Directive, the separate and much more detailed proposal with mandatory ex-ante verification of every green claim, the European Commission announced its withdrawal in June 2025; the procedure has been on hold since. That changes nothing about the term bans – they arrive via EmpCo, not via the Green Claims Directive.
And the Reddit question “Is ‘biodegradable’ even regulated?” can now be answered precisely: from 27 September 2026, yes – “biodegradable” is explicitly on the list of claims that are impermissible without proof.
How widespread generic environmental terms are is shown by the consumer discussion – the threads are also a preview of which industries are particularly in focus:
For planning campaigns, packaging and website relaunches this means: everything produced now that is still public on 27 September 2026 must already comply with the new rules.
Yes, but only under strict conditions. From 27 September 2026, the generic product claim “climate-neutral” is banned if it rests solely on carbon offsetting. Claims based on actual emission reductions in the value chain that are verifiably substantiated remain permitted. The German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has already ruled that “climate-neutral” may only be used in advertising if the term is clearly explained in the advertising itself.
Banned are generic, unsubstantiated environmental claims such as “climate-neutral”, “green”, “sustainable”, “eco-friendly”, “eco” or “biodegradable” where no recognised, verifiable proof exists. Also banned: self-invented sustainability labels without independent certification and misleading claims about durability (planned obsolescence).
From 2026, sustainability labels are only permissible if they are based on a recognised certification scheme or were established by a public authority. Self-designed “trust” or “eco” labels without independent third-party verification are no longer allowed.
No, there is no transition period. From 27 September 2026, all environmental claims – on packaging, websites, in advertising and in online shops – must meet the new requirements. Companies should review stock and communication materials in good time.
This is often confused. For the Green Claims Directive (the separate proposal with an ex-ante verification system) the European Commission announced its withdrawal in June 2025; the procedure has been on hold since. The EmpCo Directive (EU 2024/825) is unaffected, already adopted, and applies from 27 September 2026. The greenwashing ban is coming – just via EmpCo instead of the Green Claims Directive.